Thursday, March 22, 2007

NYC mayor asks Congress: Reopen 9/11 fund

REOPEN FUND FOR ALL THE RESCUE AND RECOVERY WORKERS AND VOLUNTEERS NOT JUST THE PAID UNIFORMS!

ASSOCIATED PRESS
1:21 p.m. March 21, 2007

WASHINGTON – The mayor of New York City asked Congress on Wednesday to reopen the government fund for victims of the Sept. 11 terror attacks – and spare his city the prospect of losing billions of dollars in related lawsuits.

The fund closed in December 2003, and Mayor Michael Bloomberg told a Senate panel that federal help is needed for those sickened years after the attacks.

“The mere fact that their injuries and illnesses have been slower to emerge should not disqualify them from getting the help that they need,” Bloomberg said.

Congress created the $7 billion September 11th Victim Compensation Fund soon after the attacks, and it immediately became the subject of intense debate among victims' family members and politicians for the rules by which it distributed money.

Bloomberg appeared before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, where Democrats have pledged to do more for sick ground zero workers than the Republican-controlled Congress did in past years.

Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, who has long sought more federal aid for ground zero workers, said after the hearing that she is considering, but not committed to, reopening the fund.

The New York Democrat, who is also running for president, said Congress had no answers yet on exactly how such a fund would work or how much it would cost.

“We're looking at all of this,” she said. “Our goal is to try to get help to as many people as possible.”

The original federal aid package created a $1 billion insurance fund to cover injury claims by city workers and construction workers at the World Trade Center site, which was cak"

Sunday, March 18, 2007

MIKE KILLS 'SENSITIVE' 9/11 PROBE By SUSAN EDELMAN - Regionalnews - New York Post Online Edition

MIKE KILLS 'SENSITIVE' 9/11 PROBE By SUSAN EDELMAN - Regionalnews - New York Post Online Edition:
March 18, 2007 -- Mayor Bloomberg killed a study on the city's response to the 9/11 attacks after his lawyers said they did not want a report that cited any missteps or dealt with 'environmental' or 'respirator issues,' says a former city official.

City lawyers raised fears that the proposed 'after-action report' - which the U.S. Department of Justice had offered to fund - could lead to criticism and fuel lawsuits, David Longshore, former director of special programs for the city's Office of Emergency Management, told The Post.

'The Bloomberg administration acted to sweep any potential problems under the rug,' said Longshore, who was trapped in a loading dock outside the WTC while both towers collapsed. He later developed sinusitis and throat polyps and sued the city.

Longshore, who left his city job last year, showed The Post his work notes on internal OEM discussions with city lawyers in February 2003. His notes say the Law Department 'doesn't want a critical report' and 'does not want a report that says we did anything wrong.'"

Sunday, March 11, 2007

Topographic Map Archive

Topographic Map Archive: "WTC Aerial Photo 9/23/2001
Posted by topomatt under Other Maps
No Comments

This is a high resolution aerial photograph overlay of the World Trade Center site taken on September 23, 2001.

The original photograph was obtained from the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration and has a resolution of 9,372 x 9,372. This overlay retains the original resolution. A site plan showing the locations of the former buildings is also included, and was obtained from the National Institute of Standards and Technology.


This is a high resolution aerial photograph overlay of the World Trade Center site taken on September 23, 2001.

The original photograph was obtained from the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration and has a resolution of 9,372 x 9,372. This overlay retains the original resolution. A site plan showing the locations of the former buildings is also included, and was obtained from the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Click on the screenshot above to open the KML file with Google Earth.

Friday, March 9, 2007

The Raw Story | Giuliani slammed by NYC firefighters for 'lack of respect'

The Raw Story | Giuliani slammed by NYC firefighters for 'lack of respect'

Giuliani slammed by NYC firefighters for 'lack of respect'

Michael Roston
Published: Friday March 9, 2007

Print This Email This

A recently revealed letter drafted by a group of New York City firefighters slams Rudy Giuliani for "a disgraceful lack of respect." The letter, reported yesterday at Roll Call pointed to growing "enmity" between the presidential hopeful and former New York City mayor and the heroes of 9/11 who have played such an important part in his legacy.

Josh Kurtz today revealed a a letter drafted, but never sent, by four New York City firefighters and the President of the International Association of Fire Fighters, Harold Schaitberger. The group is hosting a presidential candidates' forum and almost declined to invite Giuliani, who appears to have decided not to attend.

According to Kurtz, the letter said the former mayor had a "disgraceful lack of respect" for the New York firefighters who died in the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. They particularly assailed Giuliani for deciding to "scoop and dump" debris from the World Trade Center towers, moving it to a landfill.

"Mayor Giuliani’s actions meant that firefighters and citizens who perished would either remain buried at Ground Zero forever, with no closure for families, or be removed like garbage and deposited at the Fresh Kills Landfill," Kurtz quotes the letter as saying.

The full Roll Call article can be accessed by subscribers at the paper's website.

The full draft letter to Giuliani, obtained by Fox News, is provided below.

#

DRAFT LETTER

February 28, 2007

Dear Brothers and Sisters,

On March 14, 2007, the IAFF will host the first bi-partisan Presidential Forum of the 2008 election cycle. No other union — and very few organizations — has the credibility and respect to attract top-tier candidates from both political parties. The lineup of speakers who have agreed to participate in our Forum is truly a testament to our great union and the reputation we have built as a powerful political force and a coveted endorsement.

John Edwards, John McCain, Barack Obama, Chuck Hagel, Hillary Clinton, Chris Dodd, Joe Biden, Duncan Hunter and seven other candidates will make their case before the 1,000 delegates who will be attending the Forum and to our entire membership via same-day broadcast on our web site.

Early on, the IAFF made a decision to invite all serious candidates from both political parties — except one: former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani.

We made this decision after considerable soul-searching and close consultation with our two New York City affiliates, the Uniformed Firefighters Association Local 94 and the Uniformed Fire Officers Association Local 854, as well as our former Local 94 President and current IAFF 1st District Vice President covering New York.

The IAFF recognizes that Mayor Giuliani generally enjoys a favorable reputation as a result of his actions immediately after the tragedy of 9/11. As such, we want our affiliates and every one of our members to clearly understand the reason and rationale behind this very serious and sober decision.

Many people consider Rudy Giuliani "America's Mayor," and many of our members who don't yet know the real story, may also have a positive view of him. This letter is intended to make all of our members aware of the egregious acts Mayor Giuliani committed against our members, our fallen on 9/11, and our New York City union officers following that horrific day.

Rest assured, our exclusion of Mayor Giuliani is not about any particular contractual or policy issue or disagreement, nor is it based on his unfriendly relationship with our New York City affiliates prior to 9/11 — which we will document and explain in additional correspondence later on during the campaign. In fact, we invited several candidates with whom we have had substantial disagreement on policy issues because we feel very strongly that our members have the right to hear from all candidates, not just those who tow the IAFF line.

Regrettably, the situation with former Mayor Giuliani is very different. His actions post 9/11 rise to such an offensive and personal attack on our brother and sisterhood — and directly on our union — that the IAFF does not feel Rudy Giuliani deserves an audience of IAFF leaders and members at our own Presidential Forum.

The disrespect that he exhibited to our 343 fallen FDNY brothers, their families and our New York City IAFF leadership in the wake of that tragic day has not been forgiven or forgotten.

In November 2001, our members were continuing the painful, but necessary, task of searching Ground Zero for the remains of our fallen brothers and the thousands of innocent citizens that were killed, because precious few of those who died in the terrorist attacks had been recovered at that point.

Prior to November 2001, 101 bodies or remains of fire fighters had been recovered. And those on the horrible pile at Ground Zero believed they had just found a spot in the rubble where they would find countless more that could be given proper burial.

Nevertheless, Giuliani, with the full support of his Fire Commissioner Thomas Von Essen, decided on November 2, 2001, to sharply reduce the number of those who could search for remains at any one time. There had been as many as 300 fire fighters at a time involved in search and recovery, but Giuliani cut that number to no more than 25 who could be there at once.

In conjunction with the cut in fire fighters allowed to search, Giuliani also made a conscious decision to institute a "scoop-and-dump" operation to expedite the clean-up of Ground Zero in lieu of the more time-consuming, but respectful, process of removing debris piece by piece in hope of uncovering more remains.

Mayor Giuliani's actions meant that fire fighters and citizens who perished would either remain buried at Ground Zero forever, with no closure for families, or be removed like garbage and deposited at the Fresh Kills Landfill.

Our Local presidents at the time attempted to meet with the Mayor to stop this despicable treatment of those who perished, but he refused to even see them face-to-face.

The scoop-and-dump continued. And when hundreds of family members of the fallen joined with our affiliate leadership and members to protest Giuliani's decision, he ordered senior officers of the New York Police Department to arrest 15 of our FDNY brothers, including a number of local elected IAFF leaders.

Giuliani modified his policy after the protest because public opinion was so strongly with our members. Ultimately, he was forced to put the fire fighters back on the pile. Our protests were later proven justified as more bodies were ultimately recovered and those families given a chance for some closure and a decent burial.

Giuliani argued that the change was for our own safety, but his argument was empty and without substance. Fire fighters had been on that pile since minutes after the twin towers fell — why all of a sudden, after nearly two months working on the pile, was Giuliani concerned about fire fighter safety?

In our view, he wasn't really concerned. The fact is that the Mayor's switch to a scoop-and-dump coincided with the final removal of tens of millions of dollars of gold, silver and other assets of the Bank of Nova Scotia that were buried beneath what was once the towers. Once the money was out, Giuliani sided with the developers that opposed a lengthy recovery effort, and ordered the scoop-and-dump operation so they could proceed with redevelopment.

In the first few days immediately after the disaster, Giuliani had said he was committed to the recovery of those lost "right down to the last brick." We believed him at the time. But, what he proved with his actions is that he really meant the "last gold brick."

Giuliani crucified fire fighters after our protest and publicly stated that our members were essentially acting like babies, that they didn't have the market cornered on grief. His insensitive statements demonstrated his inability to grasp what members of the FDNY were experiencing.

What Giuliani showed is a disgraceful lack of respect for the fallen and those brothers still searching for them. He exposed our members and leaders to arrest. He valued the money and gold and wanted the site cleared before he left office at the end of 2001 more than he valued the lives and memories of those lost.

Our members deserved the right to continue with a full search for their lost brothers and other innocent victims. Proudly, as you know, the fire service has a code similar to the military, where we leave no one behind. Recovering even a piece of a turnout coat or helmet gave our FDNY brothers and sisters and the families of the fallen some small semblance of peace, something to honor. But hundreds remained entombed in Ground Zero when Giuliani gave up on them.

The fundamental lack of respect that Giuliani showed our FDNY members is unforgivable - and that's why he was not invited. Our disdain for him is not about issues or a disputed contract, it is about a visceral, personal affront to the fallen, to our union and, indeed, to every one of us who has ever risked our lives by going into a burning building to save lives and property.

We have heard from some affiliates that Giuliani's campaign is beginning to reach out to our locals, looking to build support. If you are contacted by Giuliani, Von Essen, or a representative of the Giuliani campaign, we hope you will say not just, "No," but, "Hell no." And please let the IAFF Political Affairs Department know about it by calling (202) 824-1582.

Please share this correspondence with your membership. Thank you.

Fraternally and Sincerely,

Harold A. Schaitberger, General President

Vincent J. Bollon, General Secretary-Treasurer and Past President, UFOA of NYC, Local 854

Kevin Gallagher, IAFF 1st District Vice President and Past President, UFA of NYC, Local 94

Stephen Cassidy, President, UFA of NYC, Local 94

Peter Gorman, President, UFOA of NYC, Local 854

Thursday, March 8, 2007

N.Y. lawmakers press the feds on aid for 9/11 first responders

N.Y. lawmakers press the feds on aid for 9/11 first responders:


"N.Y. lawmakers press the feds on aid for 9/11 first responders

By Sally Goldenberg
Staten Island Advance (NY)
Copyright 2007 The Republican Company, Springfield, MA.
All Rights Reserved

STATEN ISLAND, N.Y. — Health care for first responders sickened by their work at Ground Zero is an issue that has inflamed New Yorkers, and lawmakers are once again demanding answers from the federal government.

They want to know how much money will be forthcoming for the medical monitoring and treatment programs run by FDNY and Manhattan-based Mount Sinai, and when those programs will get more federal dollars.

In an argument that has evolved into a New York City-vs.-Washington, D.C., battle, members of the New York congressional delegation said yesterday that a federal Department of Health and Human Services' task force missed its self-imposed deadline of releasing its latest report by the end of February.

The department said there was no such deadline.

'We need a plan of action to monitor and treat all those who are sick or injured as a result of the terror attacks. We need a plan of action to ensure that those who need medical monitoring and care have access to it,' said Rep. Vito Fossella (R-Staten Island/Brooklyn).

At least 2,383 Staten Islanders have enrolled in the FDNY monitoring and treatment prog"

Tuesday, March 6, 2007

Senate Passes 9/11-Tied Fatal Illness Benefit

Senate Passes 9/11-Tied Fatal Illness Benefit: "Senate Passes 9/11-Tied Fatal Illness Benefit

By GINGER ADAMS OTIS
A measure guaranteeing accidental death benefits to uniformed first-responders who become fatally ill with diseases linked to Ground Zero toxins moved one step closer to fruition last week. Brooklyn State Sen. Marty Golden, a key sponsor of the legislation, announced March 1 that the Senate had given the bill final passage. The Assembly approved a similar measure Feb. 14."

Contact your legislator and ask Why are they leaving all the civilian 9-11 workers out in the cold?

Thursday, March 1, 2007

Google Image Result for http://www.belt.es/articulos/imagenes/1506061.jpg

http://www.belt.es/articulos/imagenes/1506061.jpg

Exposure to environmental toxins left thousands of 9/11 responders suffering from more severe health problems than officials anticipated. Will it get worse?

Construction supervisor John Feal arrived at Ground Zero the day after the September 11 World Trade Center attacks to help with the recovery efforts. He only worked there for five days—forced to stop when a falling steel beam crushed his left foot—but the experience has never stopped haunting him.

Foto: Newsweek

A could of asbestos, mercury and other potencially hazardous materials
hung over the city collapse

Feal, now 39, has had surgery on his foot more than two dozen times and still walks with a lopsided gait. But he’s developed other health problems, too, including gastroesophageal reflux disease, posttraumatic-stress disorder and respiratory problems. His lung capacity has diminished to the point that he occasionally stops to gasp for breath midsentence. Unable to work, and struggling to cover his mounting medical bills, Feal says at times he's felt like he's “slipping through the cracks.”

As health officials are discovering, Feal is not alone.

Only one responder’s death—that of New York City police detective James Zadroga, who succumbed to respiratory failure in January—has been directly linked by a medical examiner to his exposure to environmental toxins at Ground Zero. But at least six other deaths (from causes ranging from heart failure to lung cancer) have been reported among responders in their 30s and 40s who worked at the World Trade Center site. And thousands more are struggling with health problems far worse than officials initially anticipated. “People think that it’s just a few guys from 9/11 suffering,” says Feal, “but there are literally thousands of us.”

It’s too early to know with certainty how many deaths may result from the cocktail of asbestos, mercury, silica, fiberglass and other potentially hazardous materials released when the twin towers collapsed. Nor is it possible to say with certainty which health problems are related to the responders’ work in the rubble of the trade center. But it’s clear that many of the estimated 40,000 police, firefighters and other workers who came to the site to assist in rescue and recovery efforts have begun suffering from similar and sometimes serious ailments during the past four and a half years. “You can’t witness and be exposed to what these people were exposed to without it taking a toll,” says Dr. Stephen M. Levin, codirector of the World Trade Center Worker and Volunteer Medical Screening Program at Mount Sinai Hospital in New York. “To listen to how life has become for some patients, it’s absolutely horrifying.”

Dr. John Howard, who was appointed in February as federal coordinator of 9/11 health issues by the Bush administration, has said that the government will likely need to monitor the health of those who were at or near Ground Zero for 20 to 30 years. How much money—and manpower—that will require is unclear. But it’s likely more than the $125 million initially allocated by the federal government for 9/11 responders as part of a $20 billion federal aid package for areas affected by the terrorist attacks. “I don’t think we’re prepared to come up with a number [yet],” said Howard earlier this spring.

It's still not even clear how many may be suffering from related health problems since thousands have not yet been screened. Worse, some of the most serious health problems may not yet have emerged. “We have never done an adequate characterization of the nature and scope of the contamination, so we can’t quantify what kinds of problems people are going to face,” says David Newman, an industrial hygienist at the New York Committee for Occupational Safety and Health (NYCOSH). “There may be a whole group of people out there who may still become seriously ill.”

Dr. Levin at Mount Sinai, where more than 16,000 people have been screened, says, “We are seeing people for the first time now, more than four years later, who have been persistently symptomatic for all that time and haven’t been screened or gotten care.” He suspects there may be many more.

Unions have had a tough time persuading members to get medical checks, partly because of fears they’ll be told they can no longer work. Construction workers or emergency medical technicians can make $80,000 to more than $100,000 a year with overtime; New York Worker Compensation only pays about $400 a week. Dominick Marrocco, business agent for Local 282, which represents workers in building materials and construction, says 840 members worked at the site in the weeks following the September 11 attacks. Only 270 of them have been screened. “I wouldn’t doubt that there are people out there working still who have health problems,” he says.

Marianne Pizzitola, a pension and benefits coordinator for the uniformed Emergency Medical Services union says she’s also spoken with members who refuse to quit despite respiratory problems. “They’ve got mortgages and kids, and they can’t afford to stop working,” she says.

More than 10,700 Worker Compensation claims have been filed in New York, and nearly 94 percent have been “fully resolved,” according to Jon A. Sullivan, spokesman for the New York State Workers' Compensation Board.

But some ailing workers complain that their claims have been disputed or delayed for months—or even years. Industrial cleaner Alex Sanchez, 38, spent several days at Ground Zero clearing dust from the airshafts and indoor surfaces of the buildings around the World Trade Center site with just a washcloth or paper mask over his face. (Newman, from NYCOSH, says no more than 60 percent of workers at Ground Zero wore respirators on any given day and, on some days, just 20 percent wore them—in part, perhaps, because the Environmental Protection Agency issued a statement that the air was safe to breathe a week after the attacks, an assurance that later proved to have been dangerously premature.)

“We didn’t think about all the contamination,” says Sanchez. After just two days, his throat became irritated and he developed a chronic cough. But it was another year before Sanchez, a lifetime nonsmoker, was screened and diagnosed with several ailments—ranging from asthma and acid reflux to posttraumatic-stress disorder—and traced them back to his days at Ground Zero. He now takes 18 different medications a day and hasn’t been able to work for three years, nor can he pick up his 5-year-old son or play soccer on the weekends any longer. Some days, he can barely climb a flight of stairs and must use a cane because of the pain in his joints.

Sanchez filed for Worker Compensation in 2003. He says he was offered a lump-sum payment of $20,000 but turned it down. “People took those offers, but what happens after that money is gone?” asks Sanchez, who says he used to make about $1,100 a week before he was forced to stop working. “Respiratory illnesses don’t get better. I know the amount of World Trade Center dust I inhaled. I know what I am up against.”

He is still negotiating a settlement. In the meantime, he’s been relying on Medicaid to cover his health costs and on savings and aid from charities and his family for everything else. He’s hoping that the government might offer help. He and other ailing workers have read about the six- and seven-figure settlements for those injured at Ground Zero who filed with the September 11 Victim Compensation Fund (which stopped accepting claims in December 2003). But only responders who were hurt within 96 hours of the planes crashing into the twin towers were eligible for compensation through the fund and, in most cases, they had to have been diagnosed within three days. For many responders, the health problems emerged well after Sept. 15, 2001.

Of the 2,680 people awarded compensation (at an average payout of nearly $400,000), almost 60 percent of recipients were firefighters, and 8 percent were police officers. But only about 100 construction workers, 68 maintenance and janitorial workers and 25 EMTs and paramedics received compensation through the fund, according to the fund's special master, Kenneth Feinberg. It’s not clear how many workers in those categories applied. But out of 4,435 total injury claims filed, less than half received awards. Feal filed but was turned down since he was injured and treated on Sept. 17.

Eventually, he got about $50,000 in a Worker Compensation settlement and used it to help pay legal costs and overdue bills and rent. (Medicare covers about 75 to 80 percent of his health-care costs, he says.) When that money ran out, he sold his 1979 Corvette to supplement the $1,300 a month he gets in Social Security checks. “That’s about what I used to earn in a week,” he explains. “I pay more than that in rent.”

Foto: Newsweek

John Feal at Ground Zero
on the morning of
Sept. 17, 2001

Feal has now filed a lawsuit against his construction and insurance companies, which is under appeal. “I don’t want to be a millionaire,” he says. “I just want to be able to have the life I had before September 11.”

Several thousand other responders who’ve developed health problems since 9/11 have also turned to the courts. “Every day, people come into my office who have trouble breathing,” says attorney David Worby, who has filed a class-action lawsuit on behalf of more than 8,000 workers at Ground Zero against several defendants, including the city of New York, the Port Authority, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and contractors with workers at the site. “If we don’t get these people the help and treatment they need now, more of them may die than died on 9/11,” says Worby, who categorizes about 1,000 of his clients as “severely ill.”

Will the government create another fund for responders who didn't qualify for the Victim Compensation Fund? So far, it’s given no indication it will do so. But, as Mount Sinai’s Levin points out, billions of dollars in aid were recommended for recovery efforts after the attacks. “Out of such a vast amount of money, wouldn’t it be possible to set some aside to take care of this group of responders?” he asks. “I can’t see how any rational social policy can say it’s OK for these guys to suffer.”

Politicians from the tristate area have also been lobbying for more federal funds and an established protocol for tracking and treating the health problems suffered by those exposed to the toxins at Ground Zero. In March, the Centers for Disease Control said it would distribute $75 million of the $125 million already allocated in aid to help track and treat 9/11-related health problems—the first federal money to be spent directly on medical treatment for 9/11 health effects, says New York Democratic Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney. There are signs it won't be the last.

“There’s no doubt there’s a national responsibility here,” agrees Howard, the recently appointed federal coordinator of 9/11 health issues. “These people went down there to help without thinking about their own safety—they’re heroes. It’s important that we treat them that way.”

For those like Feal and Sanchez, such treatment couldn’t come soon enough.